Tag Archives: cessationism

Any Form of Cessationism is Anti-Christ

Mark Driscoll criticizes cessationism, but his position is still cessationism. Mark says that we can pray but it is determined by a case by case sovereign choice from God, even if we have faith.

There are degrees of cessationism, but all forms deny the biblical doctrine of Expansionism (See Vincent Cheung for more); thus, all forms of cessationism is an excommunicable sin.

Cessationism denies the baptism of the Spirit for spiritual power, which includes the gifts as portrayed in 1 Corinthians 12-14 (etc.). They deny Scripture’s command to seek all of these gifts. Thus cessationism is a contradiction to the text.

It denies Abraham’s blessing. Abraham’s blessing makes it necessary for its heirs to be healed (Luke 13:12-15). Abraham’s blessing makes miracles a regular activity in the church by faith, made possible by Jesus’ substitutionary death (Gal.3). God’s promise to Abraham makes it necessary for miracles to happen on the demand of faith. Cessationism denies this and so it denies God’s faithfulness to His Promise to Abraham and tramples the blood of Christ.

Jesus’ substitutionary atonement included things like healing (Isaiah 53:4-5 James 5:15), and so, healing always happens by the will of man through faith. By denying this cessationism denies the substitutionary atonement of Jesus, and/or its effectiveness, and thus by logical implication it denies the forgiveness of sins.

It denies Jesus’ faith doctrine that says, whatever you ask in faith, will be given to you. Jesus says this many times in many ways. This is Jesus’ direct teaching and command but it also deals with our identity in Him that we have such authority to command demons, sickness and mountains out of our way. No one is as extreme as Jesus when it comes to faith. Your theology must include Jesus’ extreme faith doctrine. Jesus also uses His faith doctrine as a test for orthodoxy (John 15:7-8); thus, any Creed that does not include Jesus’ test, cannot claim to be orthodox. By denying this, cessationism denies Jesus’ command and faith doctrine itself, our identity in Christ and Jesus’ personal test of orthodoxy.

Your theology must include “man’s will being done on earth by faith,” is as God-centered as Jesus Christ is God-centered, because He is the one who taught the doctrine. The issue people have man’s will being done on earth by faith in God’s promise, is that Jesus is too God-centered for them. There is just too much God involved. They hate that God gets to do whatever He wants, and what He wants is man’s will to be done on earth, by faith.

Cessationism is an anti-Christ, anti-scriptural, anti-gospel and and anti-God doctrine.

Ultimate Stupid Cessationist Arguments #1

Argument: “Miracles are to confirm messages from God. Jesus is the final message. Signs already confirmed Him. No more messages are being revealed. Thus, there are no more miracles.”

From childhood to non-Christians, workplace and church, this has to be one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.

For sake of argument, let us says sign gifts have ceased. So what? What logical relevance does that have to do with healing and miracles on demand of faith. It has no connection whatsoever.

This is part of the informal fallacies relating to division and composition. Just because something is true of a part, does not mean it is true of the whole.

Jesus healed the lady bent over for 18 years saying it was “necessary” because “she was a daughter of Abraham.” Jesus’ statement means healing miracles are part of Abrahams’ blessing guaranteed to his descents of faith. Jesus says this healing is not about confirming a message but about being faithful to an old promise of favor and blessings. Two different categories. Jesus’ word to the gentile woman, “to take the children’s bread,” shows Jesus saw healing as part of Abraham’s blessing to be freely given away, and not to confirm a message. Paul argues something similar in Galatians 3 saying this blessing includes miracles and the Spirit. Thus, even after the advent of the gospel, Paul says the blessing of Abraham is still in full force, which includes the Spirit (most likely the Baptism of the Spirit) and miracles. Even the cross of Jesus did not replace this promise but only made it available to gentiles. Paul speaks of miracles in Galatians 3 as if they are a common thing. Thus, common miracles are based on Abraham’s blessings secured by Jesus’ atonement. This means even if sign gifts have stopped and even if the gifts mentioned in by Paul in 1 Corinthians 12-14 have stopped, the point is logically non-relevant against saying miracles are a common experience, because God being faithful to His promise to Abraham still stands. God has not ceased in fulfilling His promise to Abraham.

The only way for miracles to stop being a common experience to Christians is if God ceases His promise to Abraham. Jesus also says in John 14 that whosoever believes in Him will do His miracles by faith, and even greater. Jesus makes such miracles in this passage about common discipleship faith, not gifts and not signs. In this passage Jesus says, “by asking anything and getting it,” gives us joy and greatly glorifies the Father. Jesus also mirrors the same extreme faith teaching in places like Matthew 21:21. The signs gifts have no logical relevance to this. None.

Dinosaurs were animals.
Dinosaurs have ceased,
therefore, animals have ceased.

People would never be so shameful or careless in normal speak to say something so irrational; and yet, they will with play such games with God’s word. When a person handles God’s word so demonically, it becomes an autobiographic mirror of their hearts.